Michael Wilson Dynasty Profile

Michael Wilson is a ARI WR with a market value of 2,094 and 13 fantasy points per game across 17 active games.

Market value

Market value 2,094

watch-list dynasty asset

Production

13

13 fantasy points per game

Last four active

17.6

Up 4.6 PPG from season pace

30-day value movement

+154

Trade frequency 1.6%

Dynalyze signal stack

Market rank

WR39

Michael Wilson prices as a Tier2 WR with a market value near 2,094.

Production rank

WR12

production rank WR12 versus market rank WR39, creating a +27 position-rank market edge.

Tier expectation

-1

13.0 PPG against a 14.0 expected baseline for this market tier.

Market activity

1.6%

30-day value move +154 with a recent scoring split of +4.6 PPG.

Michael Wilson's rank stack is position-specific inside the current player market: market rank WR39, production rank WR12, positional value gap +27, composite production score 58.1 out of 100, and value opportunity score +33.3.

Market read

Michael Wilson profiles as a watch-list dynasty asset in dynasty formats. The market is pricing him at 2,094, which puts his trade conversations in the range where managers should compare immediate lineup impact against long-term liquidity.

The production side is player-specific: Michael Wilson has produced 220.6 total fantasy points across 17 active games, with a season pace of 13 fantasy points per game and a recent four-game pace of 17.6. That gap is the starting point for evaluating whether the market is reacting fast enough.

The current Dynalyze stance is Hold and compare offers. A positive 30-day trend can signal a rising price that may require paying before the next tier jump, while a negative trend can create a discount only if production and role remain stable.

Michael Wilson is a ARI WR with a market value around 2094, 13.0 points per game, and 17.6 points per game over the last four active games. That combination makes the profile a trade-window question more than a simple player take: recent scoring is running ahead of the season baseline, while the market has been paying up over the last month.

The useful market read is discount, not hype: the same-position production rank is ahead of the same-position price rank, which creates room to start a buy conversation before the value catches up. A same-position value gap of +27 is meaningful because it compares the scoring profile against where the market is currently ranking him among WRs, not just whether the name feels exciting.

In trade talks, treat him as a targeted buy or add-on upgrade rather than a blank-check acquisition; the goal is to pay for the current market tier while capturing the stronger production profile. The counterpoint is price sensitivity. Without a major injury discount or a clear role spike, this profile is most valuable when the manager stays disciplined on tier and roster fit.

WR market lens

Michael Wilson's ARI WR profile is being judged against a Tier2 market-tier baseline of 14.0 expected points per game. Wide receiver value usually holds when production, target stability, and long-term liquidity all point in the same direction. The current -1 PPG gap against expectation shows whether the market is buying a real scoring advantage or just a premium-name floor.

Trade context

For contenders, Michael Wilson should be valued by weekly lineup contribution first. For rebuilders, the better question is whether a WR with this value profile will stay liquid through the next trade window. Managers should compare offers against position scarcity, roster timeline, and whether the asset can be rerouted later without taking a value loss.

Roster fit leans aggressive: contenders can treat Michael Wilson as a targeted upgrade if the acquisition cost still reflects the current market rank, while rebuilders should only buy if the asset remains liquid enough to reroute before the next trade window.

In trade talks, treat him as a targeted buy or add-on upgrade rather than a blank-check acquisition; the goal is to pay for the current market tier while capturing the stronger production profile.

The useful market read is discount, not hype: the same-position production rank is ahead of the same-position price rank, which creates room to start a buy conversation before the value catches up.

The counterpoint is price sensitivity. Without a major injury discount or a clear role spike, this profile is most valuable when the manager stays disciplined on tier and roster fit.

Similar Profiles

These peer checks compare Michael Wilson against nearby dynasty assets by position, market price, production rank, and weekly scoring profile.

  • Jordan Addison

    MIN WR · Market value 2,090 (-4 vs Michael Wilson)

    9.7 PPG (-3.3 vs Michael Wilson), production rank WR52, market rank WR40, positional value gap -12.

  • DJ Moore

    BUF WR · Market value 2,101 (+7 vs Michael Wilson)

    10 PPG (-3 vs Michael Wilson), production rank WR32, market rank WR38, positional value gap +6.

  • Quentin Johnston

    LAC WR · Market value 2,077 (-17 vs Michael Wilson)

    12.2 PPG (-0.8 vs Michael Wilson), production rank WR27, market rank WR42, positional value gap +15.