Bryce Lance plays WR for NO, with a market value of 352 and 3 fantasy points per game across 3 active games.
WR NO · Age 24 · Rookie
Market value
352 +21 / 30d
WR106 on the current board
Points per game
3.0
9.0 points · 3 active games
Last 4 active
3.0 0 PPG
Versus 3.0 season pace
Market edge
+14 Priced behind
WR92 production vs WR106 market
Market value · 90-day signal
Current value 352. The final 30-day move is +21.
The final 30 days use the verified market delta. Earlier points provide directional context and are not recorded daily history.
Market position
Tier expectation
-4.5 PPG vs Fringe baseline
Trade frequency
0.1% of tracked trades, 30 days
30-day move
+21 (+6.3%)
Board position
WR106 market · WR92 production
The Dynalyze take
The read
HOLD. Bryce Lance currently lacks on-field production and has not yet contributed fantasy points, which limits his immediate value. The recent upward trend in market value suggests some speculative interest, but the absence of active game data and a low trade frequency indicate uncertainty about his role.
Buy 1 · Hold 2 · Fade 0
Moderate agreement: 2 of 3 reads lean hold.
Recurring themes
WR106 market rank versus WR92 production rank BUY 1 of 3 reads
Last-four pace is 0 PPG versus season pace HOLD 2 of 3 reads
Market value is essentially flat over 30 days (+21) HOLD 2 of 3 reads
The case
Bull case
9.0 points across 3 active games. box scores
3.0 PPG is -4.5 versus the current tier baseline. model
WR92 production keeps the profile competitive at the position. model
Bear case
Last-four pace is 0 PPG versus the season rate. box scores
WR106 market rank versus WR92 production rank defines the price risk. market feed
The primary risk for Bryce Lance lies in his complete absence of fantasy production and the unknown nature of his role, which could result in prolonged dormancy. The low trade frequency and modest market value suggest that managers are not aggressively pursuing him, which may reflect skepticism about his potential. This uncertainty should caution against aggressive investment at this time. consensus
Roster fit
Contenders should hold unless an offer clearly improves the weekly lineup. model
Rebuilders should require liquidity, picks, or age insulation before moving below tier. model
Offer discipline matters more than forcing action at the current signal strength. consensus