Marcus Mariota Dynasty Profile

Marcus Mariota is a WAS QB with a market value of 316 and 12 fantasy points per game across 11 active games.

Market value

Market value 316

watch-list dynasty asset

Production

12

12 fantasy points per game

Last four active

10.4

Down 1.6 PPG from season pace

30-day value movement

-9

Trade frequency 0.13%

Dynalyze signal stack

Market rank

QB49

Marcus Mariota prices as a Fringe QB with a market value near 316.

Production rank

QB34

production rank QB34 versus market rank QB49, creating a +15 position-rank market edge.

Tier expectation

0

12.0 PPG against a 12.0 expected baseline for this market tier.

Market activity

0.1%

30-day value move -9 with a recent scoring split of -1.6 PPG.

Marcus Mariota's rank stack is position-specific inside the current player market: market rank QB49, production rank QB34, positional value gap +15, composite production score 42.6 out of 100, and value opportunity score +11.

Market read

Marcus Mariota profiles as a watch-list dynasty asset in dynasty formats. The market is pricing him at 316, which puts his trade conversations in the range where managers should compare immediate lineup impact against long-term liquidity.

The production side is player-specific: Marcus Mariota has produced 132.5 total fantasy points across 11 active games, with a season pace of 12 fantasy points per game and a recent four-game pace of 10.4. That gap is the starting point for evaluating whether the market is reacting fast enough.

The current Dynalyze stance is Hold and compare offers. A positive 30-day trend can signal a rising price that may require paying before the next tier jump, while a negative trend can create a discount only if production and role remain stable.

Marcus Mariota is a WAS QB with a market value around 316, 12.0 points per game, and 10.4 points per game over the last four active games. That combination makes the profile a trade-window question more than a simple player take: recent scoring is close to the season baseline, while the market has been comparatively steady over the last month.

The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal. A same-position value gap of +15 is meaningful because it compares the scoring profile against where the market is currently ranking him among QBs, not just whether the name feels exciting.

In trade talks, hold unless the offer solves a roster-window problem, because the current signal is not extreme enough to justify selling at a discount or buying at a premium. The counterpoint is price sensitivity. Without a major injury discount or a clear role spike, this profile is most valuable when the manager stays disciplined on tier and roster fit.

Player-specific insights

Market trajectory

Marcus Mariota sits at market rank QB49 with a dynasty value near 316, a 30-day move of -9, and trade frequency of 0.1%. That creates a stable market band where the rank gap matters more than short-term price movement instead of a position-only price check.

Production identity

Marcus Mariota's production rank QB34 is built on 12.0 PPG, 10.4 PPG over the last four active games, and 132.5 fantasy points across 11 active games. The current scoring shape is a steady scorer whose recent and season-long output are telling a similar story, with a -1.6 PPG recent split and 0 PPG versus the 12.0 tier baseline.

Risk profile

Marcus Mariota's risk profile is specific to this snapshot: price sensitivity is the main risk because neither injury nor rank spread is extreme enough to force action. The rank spread is +15 between market rank QB49 and production rank QB34, so the risk read should be tied to price discipline instead of a broad QB label.

Roster-window fit

Marcus Mariota currently grades as hold range for roster-window decisions: contenders should hold unless a deal solves a lineup hole, while rebuilders should avoid moving below tier without getting back liquidity, picks, or age insulation. The practical trade question is whether paying for QB49 still makes sense after comparing his 12.0 PPG profile against same-position alternatives.

QB market lens

Marcus Mariota's WAS QB profile is being judged against a Fringe market-tier baseline of 12.0 expected points per game. In superflex formats, quarterbacks can hold value even when weekly production is only fair, so the important check is whether the 0 PPG gap against expectation supports paying for insulation rather than just name value.

Trade context

For contenders, Marcus Mariota should be valued by weekly lineup contribution first. For rebuilders, the better question is whether a QB with this value profile will stay liquid through the next trade window. Managers should compare offers against position scarcity, roster timeline, and whether the asset can be rerouted later without taking a value loss.

Roster fit is hold-oriented: contenders should only move Marcus Mariota if the deal solves a clear lineup weakness, while rebuilders should avoid selling below tier unless the return improves age curve, picks, or positional flexibility.

In trade talks, hold unless the offer solves a roster-window problem, because the current signal is not extreme enough to justify selling at a discount or buying at a premium.

The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal.

The counterpoint is price sensitivity. Without a major injury discount or a clear role spike, this profile is most valuable when the manager stays disciplined on tier and roster fit.

Similar Profiles

These peer checks compare Marcus Mariota against nearby dynasty assets by position, market price, production rank, and weekly scoring profile.

  • Joe Milton

    DAL QB · Market value 314 (-2 vs Marcus Mariota)

    3.1 PPG (-8.9 vs Marcus Mariota), production rank QB39, market rank QB50, positional value gap +11.

  • Riley Leonard

    IND QB · Market value 346 (+30 vs Marcus Mariota)

    6.4 PPG (-5.6 vs Marcus Mariota), production rank QB38, market rank QB48, positional value gap +10.

  • Will Howard

    PIT QB · Market value 359 (+43 vs Marcus Mariota)

    0 PPG (-12 vs Marcus Mariota), production rank QB49, market rank QB47, positional value gap 0.