Mark Andrews Dynasty Profile

Mark Andrews is a BAL TE with a market value of 1,671 and 7.7 fantasy points per game across 17 active games.

Market value

Market value 1,671

watch-list dynasty asset

Production

7.7

7.7 fantasy points per game

Last four active

4.6

Down 3.1 PPG from season pace

30-day value movement

+138

Trade frequency 0.86%

Dynalyze signal stack

Market rank

TE16

Mark Andrews prices as a Tier2 TE with a market value near 1,671.

Production rank

TE26

production rank TE26 versus market rank TE16, creating a -10 position-rank market edge.

Tier expectation

-2.3

7.7 PPG against a 10.0 expected baseline for this market tier.

Market activity

0.9%

30-day value move +138 with a recent scoring split of -3.1 PPG.

Mark Andrews's rank stack is position-specific inside the current player market: market rank TE16, production rank TE26, positional value gap -10, composite production score 35.8 out of 100, and value opportunity score -30.8.

Market read

Mark Andrews profiles as a watch-list dynasty asset in dynasty formats. The market is pricing him at 1,671, which puts his trade conversations in the range where managers should compare immediate lineup impact against long-term liquidity.

The production side is player-specific: Mark Andrews has produced 131 total fantasy points across 17 active games, with a season pace of 7.7 fantasy points per game and a recent four-game pace of 4.6. That gap is the starting point for evaluating whether the market is reacting fast enough.

The current Dynalyze stance is Hold and compare offers. A positive 30-day trend can signal a rising price that may require paying before the next tier jump, while a negative trend can create a discount only if production and role remain stable.

Mark Andrews is a BAL TE with a market value around 1671, 7.7 points per game, and 4.6 points per game over the last four active games. That combination makes the profile a trade-window question more than a simple player take: recent scoring has slipped below the season baseline, while the market has been comparatively steady over the last month.

The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal. A same-position value gap of -10 is meaningful because it compares the scoring profile against where the market is currently ranking him among TEs, not just whether the name feels exciting.

In trade talks, keep him on the board but avoid chasing the latest move; the next decision should come from whether usage confirms the price direction. The counterpoint is recent scoring softness: if the last-four pace reflects a role change rather than schedule noise, the market can stay patient or move lower.

TE market lens

Mark Andrews's BAL TE profile is being judged against a Tier2 market-tier baseline of 10.0 expected points per game. Tight end value depends on scarcity as much as raw scoring. A -2.3 PPG gap versus the expected tier helps separate weekly lineup advantage from a replaceable profile that is only being lifted by position label.

Trade context

For contenders, Mark Andrews should be valued by weekly lineup contribution first. For rebuilders, the better question is whether a TE with this value profile will stay liquid through the next trade window. Managers should compare offers against position scarcity, roster timeline, and whether the asset can be rerouted later without taking a value loss.

Roster fit is timing-sensitive: contenders should wait for another usage or scoring confirmation before paying up for Mark Andrews, while rebuilders should monitor whether the market move creates a better exit than the weekly production alone would justify.

In trade talks, keep him on the board but avoid chasing the latest move; the next decision should come from whether usage confirms the price direction.

The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal.

The counterpoint is recent scoring softness: if the last-four pace reflects a role change rather than schedule noise, the market can stay patient or move lower.

Similar Profiles

These peer checks compare Mark Andrews against nearby dynasty assets by position, market price, production rank, and weekly scoring profile.

  • Brenton Strange

    JAX TE · Market value 1,644 (-27 vs Mark Andrews)

    9.8 PPG (+2.1 vs Mark Andrews), production rank TE16, market rank TE17, positional value gap +1.

  • Chig Okonkwo

    WAS TE · Market value 1,538 (-133 vs Mark Andrews)

    7.3 PPG (-0.4 vs Mark Andrews), production rank TE20, market rank TE18, positional value gap -2.

  • Travis Kelce

    KC TE · Market value 1,534 (-137 vs Mark Andrews)

    11.4 PPG (+3.7 vs Mark Andrews), production rank TE13, market rank TE19, positional value gap +6.