Mac Jones Dynasty Profile

Mac Jones is a SF QB with a market value of 984 and 12.4 fantasy points per game across 11 active games.

Market value

Market value 984

watch-list dynasty asset

Production

12.4

12.4 fantasy points per game

Last four active

5.9

Down 6.5 PPG from season pace

30-day value movement

+85

Trade frequency 0.42%

Dynalyze signal stack

Market rank

QB41

Mac Jones prices as a Bench QB with a market value near 984.

Production rank

QB35

production rank QB35 versus market rank QB41, creating a +6 position-rank market edge.

Tier expectation

-2.1

12.4 PPG against a 14.5 expected baseline for this market tier.

Market activity

0.4%

30-day value move +85 with a recent scoring split of -6.5 PPG.

Mac Jones's rank stack is position-specific inside the current player market: market rank QB41, production rank QB35, positional value gap +6, composite production score 39.2 out of 100, and value opportunity score -14.7.

Market read

Mac Jones profiles as a watch-list dynasty asset in dynasty formats. The market is pricing him at 984, which puts his trade conversations in the range where managers should compare immediate lineup impact against long-term liquidity.

The production side is player-specific: Mac Jones has produced 136 total fantasy points across 11 active games, with a season pace of 12.4 fantasy points per game and a recent four-game pace of 5.9. That gap is the starting point for evaluating whether the market is reacting fast enough.

The current Dynalyze stance is Hold and compare offers. A positive 30-day trend can signal a rising price that may require paying before the next tier jump, while a negative trend can create a discount only if production and role remain stable.

Mac Jones is a SF QB with a market value around 984, 12.4 points per game, and 5.9 points per game over the last four active games. That combination makes the profile a trade-window question more than a simple player take: recent scoring has slipped below the season baseline, while the market has been comparatively steady over the last month.

The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal. A same-position value gap of +6 is meaningful because it compares the scoring profile against where the market is currently ranking him among QBs, not just whether the name feels exciting.

In trade talks, keep him on the board but avoid chasing the latest move; the next decision should come from whether usage confirms the price direction. The counterpoint is recent scoring softness: if the last-four pace reflects a role change rather than schedule noise, the market can stay patient or move lower.

QB market lens

Mac Jones's SF QB profile is being judged against a Bench market-tier baseline of 14.5 expected points per game. In superflex formats, quarterbacks can hold value even when weekly production is only fair, so the important check is whether the -2.1 PPG gap against expectation supports paying for insulation rather than just name value.

Trade context

For contenders, Mac Jones should be valued by weekly lineup contribution first. For rebuilders, the better question is whether a QB with this value profile will stay liquid through the next trade window. Managers should compare offers against position scarcity, roster timeline, and whether the asset can be rerouted later without taking a value loss.

Roster fit is timing-sensitive: contenders should wait for another usage or scoring confirmation before paying up for Mac Jones, while rebuilders should monitor whether the market move creates a better exit than the weekly production alone would justify.

In trade talks, keep him on the board but avoid chasing the latest move; the next decision should come from whether usage confirms the price direction.

The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal.

The counterpoint is recent scoring softness: if the last-four pace reflects a role change rather than schedule noise, the market can stay patient or move lower.

Similar Profiles

These peer checks compare Mac Jones against nearby dynasty assets by position, market price, production rank, and weekly scoring profile.

  • Kirk Cousins

    LV QB · Market value 972 (-12 vs Mac Jones)

    10.9 PPG (-1.5 vs Mac Jones), production rank QB33, market rank QB42, positional value gap +9.

  • Anthony Richardson

    IND QB · Market value 1,020 (+36 vs Mac Jones)

    1.1 PPG (-11.3 vs Mac Jones), production rank QB39, market rank QB40, positional value gap +1.

  • Justin Fields

    KC QB · Market value 946 (-38 vs Mac Jones)

    16 PPG (+3.6 vs Mac Jones), production rank QB26, market rank QB43, positional value gap +17.