Kyle Pitts Dynasty Profile

Kyle Pitts is a ATL TE with a market value of 2,878 and 12.4 fantasy points per game across 17 active games.

Market value

Market value 2,878

depth value with trade liquidity

Production

12.4

12.4 fantasy points per game

Last four active

19.9

Up 7.5 PPG from season pace

30-day value movement

-47

Trade frequency 1.2%

Dynalyze signal stack

Market rank

TE8

Kyle Pitts prices as a Tier1 TE with a market value near 2,878.

Production rank

TE2

production rank TE2 versus market rank TE8, creating a +6 position-rank market edge.

Tier expectation

+0.4

12.4 PPG against a 12.0 expected baseline for this market tier.

Market activity

1.2%

30-day value move -47 with a recent scoring split of +7.5 PPG.

Kyle Pitts's rank stack is position-specific inside the current player market: market rank TE8, production rank TE2, positional value gap +6, composite production score 76.1 out of 100, and value opportunity score +26.4.

Market read

Kyle Pitts profiles as a depth value with trade liquidity in dynasty formats. The market is pricing him at 2,878, which puts his trade conversations in the range where managers should compare immediate lineup impact against long-term liquidity.

The production side is player-specific: Kyle Pitts has produced 210.8 total fantasy points across 17 active games, with a season pace of 12.4 fantasy points per game and a recent four-game pace of 19.9. That gap is the starting point for evaluating whether the market is reacting fast enough.

The current Dynalyze stance is Production-led buy window. A positive 30-day trend can signal a rising price that may require paying before the next tier jump, while a negative trend can create a discount only if production and role remain stable.

Kyle Pitts is a ATL TE with a market value around 2878, 12.4 points per game, and 19.9 points per game over the last four active games. That combination makes the profile a trade-window question more than a simple player take: recent scoring is running ahead of the season baseline, while the market has been comparatively steady over the last month.

The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal. A same-position value gap of +6 is meaningful because it compares the scoring profile against where the market is currently ranking him among TEs, not just whether the name feels exciting.

In trade talks, keep him on the board but avoid chasing the latest move; the next decision should come from whether usage confirms the price direction. The counterpoint is price sensitivity. Without a major injury discount or a clear role spike, this profile is most valuable when the manager stays disciplined on tier and roster fit.

TE market lens

Kyle Pitts's ATL TE profile is being judged against a Tier1 market-tier baseline of 12.0 expected points per game. Tight end value depends on scarcity as much as raw scoring. A +0.4 PPG gap versus the expected tier helps separate weekly lineup advantage from a replaceable profile that is only being lifted by position label.

Trade context

For contenders, Kyle Pitts should be valued by weekly lineup contribution first. For rebuilders, the better question is whether a TE with this value profile will stay liquid through the next trade window. Managers should compare offers against position scarcity, roster timeline, and whether the asset can be rerouted later without taking a value loss.

Roster fit is timing-sensitive: contenders should wait for another usage or scoring confirmation before paying up for Kyle Pitts, while rebuilders should monitor whether the market move creates a better exit than the weekly production alone would justify.

In trade talks, keep him on the board but avoid chasing the latest move; the next decision should come from whether usage confirms the price direction.

The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal.

The counterpoint is price sensitivity. Without a major injury discount or a clear role spike, this profile is most valuable when the manager stays disciplined on tier and roster fit.

Similar Profiles

These peer checks compare Kyle Pitts against nearby dynasty assets by position, market price, production rank, and weekly scoring profile.

  • Kenyon Sadiq

    NYJ TE · Market value 2,864 (-14 vs Kyle Pitts)

    0 PPG (-12.4 vs Kyle Pitts), production rank TE41, market rank TE9, positional value gap 0.

  • Sam LaPorta

    DET TE · Market value 2,939 (+61 vs Kyle Pitts)

    11.9 PPG (-0.5 vs Kyle Pitts), production rank TE11, market rank TE7, positional value gap -4.

  • Harold Fannin

    CLE TE · Market value 3,417 (+539 vs Kyle Pitts)

    11.7 PPG (-0.7 vs Kyle Pitts), production rank TE5, market rank TE6, positional value gap +1.