Justin Fields is a KC QB with a market value of 946 and 16 fantasy points per game across 9 active games.
Market value
Market value 946
watch-list dynasty asset
Production
16
16 fantasy points per game
Last four active
13.1
Down 2.9 PPG from season pace
30-day value movement
+10
Trade frequency 0.41%
Dynalyze signal stack
Market rank
QB43
Justin Fields prices as a Bench QB with a market value near 946.
Production rank
QB26
production rank QB26 versus market rank QB43, creating a +17 position-rank market edge.
Tier expectation
+1.5
16.0 PPG against a 14.5 expected baseline for this market tier.
Market activity
0.4%
30-day value move +10 with a recent scoring split of -2.9 PPG.
Justin Fields's rank stack is position-specific inside the current player market: market rank QB43, production rank QB26, positional value gap +17, composite production score 53.4 out of 100, and value opportunity score +16.2.
Market read
Justin Fields profiles as a watch-list dynasty asset in dynasty formats. The market is pricing him at 946, which puts his trade conversations in the range where managers should compare immediate lineup impact against long-term liquidity.
The production side is player-specific: Justin Fields has produced 143.7 total fantasy points across 9 active games, with a season pace of 16 fantasy points per game and a recent four-game pace of 13.1. That gap is the starting point for evaluating whether the market is reacting fast enough.
The current Dynalyze stance is Hold and compare offers. A positive 30-day trend can signal a rising price that may require paying before the next tier jump, while a negative trend can create a discount only if production and role remain stable.
Justin Fields is a KC QB with a market value around 946, 16.0 points per game, and 13.1 points per game over the last four active games. That combination makes the profile a trade-window question more than a simple player take: recent scoring has slipped below the season baseline, while the market has been comparatively steady over the last month.
The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal. A same-position value gap of +17 is meaningful because it compares the scoring profile against where the market is currently ranking him among QBs, not just whether the name feels exciting.
In trade talks, keep him on the board but avoid chasing the latest move; the next decision should come from whether usage confirms the price direction. The counterpoint is recent scoring softness: if the last-four pace reflects a role change rather than schedule noise, the market can stay patient or move lower.
QB market lens
Justin Fields's KC QB profile is being judged against a Bench market-tier baseline of 14.5 expected points per game. In superflex formats, quarterbacks can hold value even when weekly production is only fair, so the important check is whether the +1.5 PPG gap against expectation supports paying for insulation rather than just name value.
Trade context
For contenders, Justin Fields should be valued by weekly lineup contribution first. For rebuilders, the better question is whether a QB with this value profile will stay liquid through the next trade window. Managers should compare offers against position scarcity, roster timeline, and whether the asset can be rerouted later without taking a value loss.
Roster fit is timing-sensitive: contenders should wait for another usage or scoring confirmation before paying up for Justin Fields, while rebuilders should monitor whether the market move creates a better exit than the weekly production alone would justify.
In trade talks, keep him on the board but avoid chasing the latest move; the next decision should come from whether usage confirms the price direction.
The useful market read is patience: price and production are close enough that a forced buy or sell is less attractive than waiting for a clearer role, health, or usage signal.
The counterpoint is recent scoring softness: if the last-four pace reflects a role change rather than schedule noise, the market can stay patient or move lower.
Similar Profiles
These peer checks compare Justin Fields against nearby dynasty assets by position, market price, production rank, and weekly scoring profile.